“In myself, I know that I’m the best offspinner in the world,” claims South African, who has been the leading spinner in county cricket since signing in 2017

Matt Roller09-Sep-2019Try to think of a synonym for the word ‘Kolpak’. What’s the first one that comes into your head? Sell-out? Journeyman? Mercenary?Since Claude Henderson signed for Leicestershire in 2004, via an obscure ruling by the European Court of Justice, the term has become part of the cricketing vocabulary of both England and South Africa. The players who have exploited that loophole to sign county deals – some of them lucrative – and give up international cricket in the process have been vilified, put down, and dismissed as money-grabbers who care more about their wallets than the chance to play for their country.But from the perspective of Simon Harmer, who signed a deal with Essex ahead of the 2017 season and has been the leading spinner in county cricket in the years since, the stereotype could hardly be further from the truth.”It’s very weak and easy by the media to write articles about things being all because of the money,” Harmer tells ESPNcricinfo. “It’s not all because of the money – they write those articles because that’s what sells.”The fact of the matter is that the opportunity in England beats the opportunity in South Africa. I know that if I come over here, I can retire when I want to retire, whereas in South Africa, they might chance a ruling, and that’s the end of my cricket career.” Though as it turns out, politics in this country isn’t so simple either.If Harmer’s situation was different from many of those who signed Kolpak deals at similar times – he had been dropped by the national team after only five Tests, and had not been offered a domestic contract at home – that has not stopped him from being tarred with the same brush as some of his compatriots.”I’ve been guilty by association,” he says. “Where I was in my cricket, and where – I’m not going to mention names – but where other players were, I feel like it’s very different.”I signed a six-month, £30,000 deal with Essex to come over and it was basically a shop window, whereas other players signed long-term deals for a lot more money. For me, I wasn’t offered a contract back in South Africa – if things didn’t go according to plan at Essex, I’d have gone back to South Africa unemployed, and was probably looking at life after cricket.”It wasn’t about the money, it was about opportunity. There’s zero security in South Africa – that’s the reason players sign Kolpak deals, because of the security and the opportunity. Yes, the money is part and parcel of it because the rand is weak against sterling, but I can guarantee you now, for 95 percent of the guys that have signed Kolpak deals, it’s about opportunity and security.”Harmer mentions too the impact of transformation targets, which require South African domestic and international teams to contain a minimum number of players of colour, and says that while he “completely understands” the rationale behind the policies, he doesn’t agree with how they are implemented.”It’s affecting players of colour,” he says, “because they’re forced into a role and they’re not allowed to develop their skill. They get thrust in and then thrust out, and then they find the next person to come in.”If I were to lose my place for a player of colour then I don’t have an issue with that. But as a sportsman, I need to maximise my earning potential, and to commit in South Africa where the transformation targets are constantly evolving … your opportunities do get less and less.”It’s the nature of South African sport. It’s always going to be there, it’s never going to go away. It’s such a sore topic and taboo to speak about, but it is what it is.”In his three years at Essex, Harmer has taken a remarkable 194 wickets in the County Championship at an average of just 20.40, winning 25 of the 38 games he has played for them. In that time period, no other team in either division has won 20.